- HPV is a sexually transmitted disease
- HPV is responsible for causing cervical cancer
- Having HPV does not automatically lead to cervical cancer
- The highest incidence rates for cervical cancer are ages 25-50 years old
- Men only carry HPV
- HPV may not manifest as cervical cancer for decades after exposure
The researchers found in this study that states with the highest incidence of cervical cancer had the lowest HPV vaccination rates, and states with lowest incidence of cervical cancer had highest rates of HPV vaccination. Superficially, the quick interpretation of this finding is that HPV vaccination prevents cervical cancer. If you're pro-vaccination, you make a celebratory leap and roll up your sleeve for the shot. But wait a second. While there is this finding, I would call it coincidental at this stage. The HPV vaccine has been on the market for, at best, seven years. This really leaves not enough time for there to be any adequate or accurate correlations to be made between vaccines and incidence rates when the disease often takes many years, even decades, to manifest.
Those of you who know me know I'm not the biggest supporter or fan of vaccines in general. I've gotten vaccinations from time to time. I was raised in the "time of glowing miracles of new vaccines" - small pox, polio, etc. I stood in line in my school cafeteria waiting for my shots and polio sugar cube. Clearly diseases can be avoided through the use of vaccines. There is something real about the "herd immunity" given through vaccinations. For the individual however, the potential for side effects and living with health hazards brought by the vaccinations themselves do have to be weighed. Individuals should still have the right to choose "their poison" so to speak. There has been a tremendous swing in society toward an almost universal mandate to vaccinate. My patients tell stories, and I have experienced myself, extreme hostility from pro-vaccination people for not wanting me or my family vaccinated. If public health officials could guarantee with 100% certainty you won't react poorly to a vaccine, then they would have the responsibility to mandate 100% vaccination. But, they can't make that guarantee. The federal government has even waived our legal option to sue a pharmaceutical company for damages from a poor vaccine outcome. Everyone knows and every medical professional MUST admit and inform you that there are dangers from injecting foreign immunological products into your body. We should be allowed to choose our health risks for ourselves, and our children!
HPV vaccines do have some serious problems in a small percentage of the population receiving them. Cervical cancer is a sexually transmitted disease. It IS a serious disease and WILL kill you if you ignore it. Celibate individuals should not be forced into vaccinations. There are effective ways to prevent or deal with cervical cancer without the vaccine. Getting a PAP smear every year is 100% safe and very effective at catching cellular changes early. These changes can be effectively addressed through simple in-office gynecological procedures. I use vitamin A suppositories in the vagina, which appears to effectively prevent HPV from triggering its cellular mutations. There are other natural anti-viral protocols that also address cervical health. So, pick your poison. Not every woman wants to get a PAP smear, or endure office procedures inter-vaginally. If you don't want to do that and you're sexually active, then get the vaccination! Or go the other way I've just laid out and skip the vaccination. Take charge of your health and make the choice that fits best for you without being unduly influenced by the pro-vaccination researchers' hype jobs, which is what I think this "study" is trying to accomplish.